Issue: Energy: Safety of Energy Production

Energy production can entail risks to the ecology of a local or even larger area. This includes all aspects of ecological safety, including impacts on geology, physical structures, and living organisms. This issue is asking for proposals to address improvements in safety in any area of energy production.

Instruction: Under each of the topics below, please make your contribution of a proposal to deal with the topic/problem, or provide a statement of unintended consequences. Feel free to comment on any contribution submitted by others.
  • Nuclear Energy - Underground Safe Storage of Nuclear Waste Storage Casks

    A major concern with regard to the continuing use (and even termination of use) of nuclear power to generate electricity is how to deal with long term storage of above ground high-level waste dry storage casks at the site(s) where the waste is generated or relocated. A proposal for transferring such casks from above ground locations, where they are potentially at risk due to storms, geologic movement, failure of containment and also terrorist attack (and razing the fears of area communities), has been proposed. It is to create underground silo storage locations at selected sites in geologically appropriate locations around the country. This proposed solution has been submitted to the Nuclear Registry Commission ("Subject: Proposal for Underground Storage of High Level Nuclear Waste Casks" Oct. 11, 2011). Comments are requested in response to the proposal submitted.

  • Keystone XL Pipeline

    There is considerable debate as to whether or not the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline should proceed. While one argument presented is that it would lead to more jobs, it appears that the greatest number of such jobs will be temporary, and could easily be surpassed by a focus in the U.S. on infrastructure renewal. In addition, it is not clear that the pipeline is essential to the profits of the oil industry. While moving crude oil across the U.S. might be a safer alternative then doing so by rail, its construction by itself at this time might not significantly reduce rail transport either. On balance, it is suggested that the construction of the pipeline not be approved.

Spreading the Word About the NewUSA Issues ForumĀ®

If you believe that this deliberative effort is worthwhile, please distribute the website address of the NewUSA Issues ForumĀ® to those who you believe might want to participate. We welcome a thoughtful sharing of ideas. This is a community project!

About The Founder

The Founder and President of NewUSA Issues Forum is Martin L. Meltz, Ph.D. He is a retired biomedical research scientist, Full Professor, businessman, corporate officer, and long-time community volunteer. He was born and raised in New York State, lived and worked for 35 years in Texas, and is now living in California. Martin has sponsored the development of this issues forum to allow Americans of different political viewpoints to work together to propose solutions to common problems.

NewUSA Issues Forum

Cartoonist: Joseph Rank

Moderators Needed

Do you have a solution to an American problem? Are you willing to post it and then receive input and constructive criticism, or substitute a better suggestion received from others, including those with a different position then you have? Are you willing to synthesize a better solution? Are you prepared to volunteer your time, without renumeration, to moderate the topic? If so, visit Role of a Moderator, and volunteer!
(See Roles)

Copyright © NewUSA Issues Forum™ 2013. All Rights Reserved.
Web Design by SDM