Issue: Taxation: Federal - Current Policy and Practice
It is the purpose of this topic area to specify different areas of current tax policy and their rates, and advocate for ways to alter them so as to increase national tax revenues. Any proposals should strive to arrange for some level of equity across income classes in paying for the expenses of the federal government, and have all citizens involved in doing so. This advocacy is requested under the thesis that if you don't contribute to paying for a national expense, and aren't asked do so in a reasonably fair manner, you won't respect and appreciate what you are paying for.
There is ongoing discussion of the need for regulatory reform, but not sufficient discussion of how this would be accomplished. The cost of a new bureaucracy to undertake periodic examinations of regulations is prohibitive, and leaving ongoing regulatory reform in the hands of our political system is fraught with all types of problems. The following internal review system, within any and all organizations within governments at any level, is proposed:
Internal agency teams of nine (9) persons would be appointed by the working members of each organization, three (3) of whom could be appointed by the management of that organization. Each member would serve only one three (3) year term, with one-third of the members being replaced each year. The function of this team is to review one ninth to one third of the regulations of the organization, depending on the total number of regulations in place. In large organizations, with extensive regulations, these persons would be freed of their current job responsibilities, and be guaranteed their position back after their term of service.
The responsibility of the team members is to review the regulations assigned for review for that year, and to determine if a) each regulation is practical and serving the purpose for which it is in place, therefore recommending its renewal; b) not adequately performing its purpose as designed, and therefore recommending its revision to improve its function; c) inadequately performing its purpose as designed, and therefore recommending its elimination (with or without a recommendation for replacement); d) has become far too costly, and needs to be revised, reduced in size, or terminated; and e) it is working so well, that its application to other areas could be recommended.