Issue: Taxation: Federal- Avoidance of Payment

Taxation at the federal level is presumably for the purpose of covering the cost of those national expenses that we have collectively decided are either required by our Constitution as currently interpreted, or otherwise necessary and worthwhile and within our body of current law. Responsibility for deciding what funds should be collected and expended, and for what, rests with the U.S. Congress and the President. The decisions made on federal income and expenses can be based on interpretation, custom, politics, and law, and may or may not be based on reality and fairness. One of the sources of great frustration to many is the complexity of the U.S. Tax Code, and the manner in which potential payees of taxes can avoid payment through the use of tax loopholes, credits, exemptions, shelters, etc. This of course results in a decrease of income to pay for federal government expenses. It is the purpose of this Issue area to identify specific methods used by individuals and organizations to reduce or avoid payment of taxes, with recommendations as to how to change or eliminate them.

Instruction: Under each of the topics below, please make your contribution of a proposal to deal with the topic/problem, or provide a statement of unintended consequences. Feel free to comment on any contribution submitted by others.
  • Repatriation of Overseas Fund

    The amount of funds "parked" by major corporations overseas is very large and continues to grow. These funds are not available to support the economy within the United States, and are not available for increasing employment within the United States. A process needs to be established whereby the companies keeping these funds overseas can be encouraged to bring them back, and a program needs to be put in place so that this parking of funds overseas is less financially rewarding. One immediate approach which has been suggested is to establish a 90 day "holiday," during which time the tax on return funds would be reduced. This could be to tax the funds at approximately 12%; it also might include the option of allowing for a slightly lower tax rate for any portion of the returned funds that are placed for a period of time in an infrastructure bank.

Spreading the Word About the NewUSA Issues ForumĀ®

If you believe that this deliberative effort is worthwhile, please distribute the website address of the NewUSA Issues ForumĀ® to those who you believe might want to participate. We welcome a thoughtful sharing of ideas. This is a community project!

About The Founder

The Founder and President of NewUSA Issues Forum is Martin L. Meltz, Ph.D. He is a retired biomedical research scientist, Full Professor, businessman, corporate officer, and long-time community volunteer. He was born and raised in New York State, lived and worked for 35 years in Texas, and is now living in California. Martin has sponsored the development of this issues forum to allow Americans of different political viewpoints to work together to propose solutions to common problems.

NewUSA Issues Forum

Cartoonist: Joseph Rank

Moderators Needed

Do you have a solution to an American problem? Are you willing to post it and then receive input and constructive criticism, or substitute a better suggestion received from others, including those with a different position then you have? Are you willing to synthesize a better solution? Are you prepared to volunteer your time, without renumeration, to moderate the topic? If so, visit Role of a Moderator, and volunteer!
(See Roles)

Copyright © NewUSA Issues Forum™ 2013. All Rights Reserved.
Web Design by SDM